Manasseh Azure: Courtroom Evidence Must Trump Public Emotion in Corruption Trials
Liwalmor M-Moadan
Journalist

has argued that judicial decisions should carry greater weight than public opinion, saying the Court of Appeal’s acquittal of former MASLOC Chief Executive Sedina Tamakloe highlights weaknesses in Ghana’s prosecution system rather than flaws in the judiciary.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, Awuni said his review of the court’s judgment convinced him that the outcome reflected evidentiary shortcomings by prosecutors, not judicial bias. “If I have to choose between the court and public sentiment, I would side with the court,” he said, stressing that criminal convictions depend on proof beyond reasonable doubt rather than public perception.
His comments shift the focus of Ghana’s anti-corruption debate from allegations and political rhetoric to the quality of investigations and courtroom preparation. Awuni argued that accountability campaigners should scrutinise how corruption cases are investigated and prosecuted instead of assuming acquittals necessarily indicate judicial failure.
Drawing on his experience during the prosecution linked to his Contracts for Sale investigation, he recalled that critical documentary evidence was only introduced after he personally raised concerns, illustrating how prosecutorial lapses can undermine otherwise compelling cases.
Awuni noted that the public often sees allegations but remains unaware of the evidentiary standards required in court. He cited the prosecution’s failure to obtain straightforward confirmation from the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) on key procurement approvals as an example of investigative gaps that ultimately weakened the state’s case.
He warned that even seemingly minor omissions can become decisive in criminal proceedings because prosecutors must establish every element of an offence beyond reasonable doubt. According to him, the Sedina Tamakloe ruling should serve as a wake-up call for stronger investigations, more meticulous case preparation and higher prosecutorial standards in Ghana’s fight against corruption.
Rather than questioning the integrity of the courts, Awuni concluded, public pressure should be directed toward ensuring state prosecutors present complete, evidence-based cases capable of surviving judicial scrutiny.
Written by
Liwalmor M-Moadan
M-Moadan is dedicated journalist committed to delivering accurate, timely, and impactful news. Passionate about uncovering the facts, telling meaningful stories, and keeping the public informed with integrity and professionalism.
Related Stories

Tunisia Tops Africa’s Currency Rankings as Ghana’s Cedi Holds Fourth Spot
Tunisia retained the title of Africa’s strongest currency in July 2026, while Ghana’s cedi ranked fourth on the continent, underscoring the resilience of a...

GIPA Urges Infrastructure Push to Stem Crop Losses and Attract Agribusiness Capital
Ghana’s efforts to position agriculture as a major investment destination will remain constrained unless critical infrastructure gaps that fuel post-harvest...

MTN Tightens Digital Lending as Ghana Card Link Ends Escape Route for MoMo Loan Defaulters
MTN Ghana has signalled a tougher era for digital lending, warning that borrowers who default on Mobile Money (MoMo) loans will no longer be able to evade...
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.